Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Xeon E3-1220 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 1965 days newer than Xeon E3-1220 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 80 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 - 6 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
154
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$225
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10950 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v3 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |