Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 1061 days newer than Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 2% better in Lost Ark than Pentium G6950 - 222 vs 218 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 55 vs 73 Watts
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Pentium G6950
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Clarkdale | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 73 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 21.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
