Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 478 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10500.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-10500 - 193 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10500 - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10500
- Up to 61% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$179.15 vs CA$458.88
- Up to 61% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900KF - CA$0.94 vs CA$2.38 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
193
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.38/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$458.88
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$458.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
190
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Core i5-10500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |