Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 1092 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 1% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Celeron G6900 - 119 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - CA$113.5 vs CA$535.15
- Up to 79% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i9-9900KF - CA$0.96 vs CA$4.5 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
119
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.5/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$535.15
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$535.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10446 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
118
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.96/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$113.5
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |