Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2418 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than Xeon E5-2665 - 184 vs 178 FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 95 vs 115 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2665 doesn't have integrated graphics
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
184
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$659
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9386 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2665 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 115 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |