Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Xeon E5-2665 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3045 days newer than Xeon E5-2665.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 15% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2665 - 368 vs 321 FPS
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 105 vs 115 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2665 - 24 vs 16 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
368
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.98/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$728.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$728.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2665 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |