Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Rocket League than FX-8300 - 730 vs 673 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - CA$83.46 vs CA$659.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-9900K - CA$0.12 vs CA$0.9 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
730
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.9/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$659
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$659 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14329 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
673
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14329 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |