Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1352 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - CA$577.88 vs CA$2358.48
- Up to 70% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i5-13400F - CA$1.47 vs CA$4.83 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 24% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-9900 - 488 vs 393 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
393
80%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.47/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$577.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$577.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.83/FPS
30%
Price, CA$
CA$2358.48
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$2,358.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |