Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900 is 202 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900
- Performs up to 5% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 180 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$597.89 vs CA$1004.5
- Up to 43% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$3.32 vs CA$5.87 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900 - 24 vs 16 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$597.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$597.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
171
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.87/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$1004.5
59%
Buy for CA$1,004.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |