Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 1098 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 130 vs 123 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 135 vs 140 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
130
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 204 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Skylake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |