Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 2200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 155 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 2200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 5% better in Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 2200G - 265 vs 253 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Up to 53% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$280.0 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 51% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-7920X - CA$1.11 vs CA$2.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
265
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.27/FPS
48%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
253
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 88 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Skylake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |