Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7920X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-2600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-2600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-7920X is 2436 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-2600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-2600K - 106 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2600K - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - CA$212.04 vs CA$600.75
- Up to 60% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-7920X - CA$2.26 vs CA$5.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
FPS
106
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.67/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$600.75
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$600.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
94
88%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.26/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$212.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$212.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7920X | vs | Intel Core i7-2600K |
---|---|---|
Sep 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 3000 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |