Buy on Amazon
CA$864.13
In Stock
Core i9-14900F vs FX-6300: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
MSRP in USD: $524
MSRP in USD: $132
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4094 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
593
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.46/FPS
17%
Price, CA$
CA$864.13
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$864.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
237
39%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |
Counter-Strike 2, 1920 x 1080, Very High
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Core i9-14900F
32 GB, 1 TB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
CA$4,902.89
In Stock
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.