Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 2090 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 7 2700X - 263 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 32 vs 16 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$368.75 vs CA$860.35
- Up to 53% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.54 vs CA$3.27 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
263
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.27/FPS
47%
Price, CA$
CA$860.35
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$860.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
240
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$368.75
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$368.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 105 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |