Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1646 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 3 3200G - 162 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - CA$133.26 vs CA$789.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-14900 - CA$1.07 vs CA$4.87 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
162
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.87/FPS
21%
Price, CA$
CA$789
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12674 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
125
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.07/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.26
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12670 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-14900 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |