Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3071 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 12% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1840 - 168 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Up to 94% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - CA$41.21 vs CA$678.99
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$678.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Buy for CA$41.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 271 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
16.986209216279853%
Multi-Core
854
4.2485448485149995%
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |