Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1136 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield V than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 285 vs 258 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-13900 - 48 vs 32 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
258
90%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.13/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1580.77
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,580.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 48 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |