Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3243 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 22% better in Battlefield 2042 than Core i7-3770 - 180 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$128.88 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.87 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
180
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
39%
Price, CA$
CA$400
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
148
82%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$128.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$128.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |