Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3066 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 64% better in Dirt 5 than FX-6300 - 229 vs 140 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 16 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$59.57 vs CA$400.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.43 vs CA$1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.75/FPS
24%
Price, CA$
CA$400
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
140
61%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$59.57
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$59.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900K | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |