Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 1533 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-7600K - 657 vs 571 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-7600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7600K - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7600K
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - CA$235.0 vs CA$465.46
- Up to 42% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-11900F - CA$0.41 vs CA$0.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
657
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$465.46
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$465.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 29 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
571
86%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.41/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$235
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-11900F | vs | Intel Core i5-7600K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |