Buy on Amazon
CA$1,400
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10940X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10940X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 7 2700 - 235 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 28 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-10940X - CA$280.0 vs CA$1400.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i9-10940X - CA$1.21 vs CA$5.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
235
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.96/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$1400
20%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10940X Desktop Processor 14 Cores up to 4.8GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W, BX8069510940X
Buy for CA$1,400 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
231
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$280
100%
Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 Processor with Wraith Spire LED Cooler - YD2700BBAFBOX
Buy for CA$280 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-10940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10940X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
