Buy on Amazon
CA$835
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $299
Availability
MSRP in USD: $299
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 2700 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 548 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 2700.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Valheim than Ryzen 7 2700 - 203 vs 197 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 20 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$158.27 vs CA$835.0
- Up to 81% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-10900X - CA$0.8 vs CA$4.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
203
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.11/FPS
19%
Price, CA$
CA$835
18%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$835 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12242 minutes ago
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
197
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.27
100%
Value Winner
CPU Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 R7 2700 3.2 GHz Eight-Core Sixteen-Thread 16M 65W CPU Processor Socket AM4 YD2700BBM88AF
Buy for CA$158.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12241 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Ryzen 7 2700
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
| Core i9 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Cascade Lake | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
| Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 8 |
20 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 165 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
