Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-10900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K and the cheaper Core i9-10900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900 - 194 vs 193 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Up to 40% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$418.54 vs CA$699.84
- Up to 40% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-10900K - CA$2.17 vs CA$3.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.61/FPS
60%
Price, CA$
CA$699.84
59%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$699.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2953 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
193
99%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$418.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$418.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2953 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |