Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 16% better in Starfield than Core i3-6100 - 64 vs 55 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - CA$59.99 vs CA$699.99
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 51 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$699.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76360 minutes ago
Buy for CA$59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1194
68.26758147512865%
Multi-Core
2336
25.493833897195238%
Intel Core i9-10900K | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |