Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 840 days newer than Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Celeron G3930 - 244 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$401.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$401.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
39.25112976113622%
Multi-Core
1043
16.671994884910486%
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |