Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700F outperforms the more expensive FX-9590 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2142 days newer than the more expensive FX-9590.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-9590 - 153 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than FX-9590 - CA$401.6 vs CA$549.41
- Up to 31% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-9590 - CA$2.62 vs CA$3.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
153
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.62/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$401.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$401.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 694 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
FPS
145
94.77124183006535%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.79/FPS
69.12928759894459%
Price, CA$
CA$549.41
73%
Buy for CA$549.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 689 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |