Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-9700 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-9700 is 202 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700
- Performs up to 2% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 244 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$265.03 vs CA$970.66
- Up to 73% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$1.09 vs CA$4.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
244
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.09/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265.03
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
240
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.04/FPS
26%
Price, CA$
CA$970.66
27%
Buy for CA$970.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 63 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |