Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Core i7-920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 3866 days newer than Core i7-920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 74% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-920XM - 401 vs 231 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
401
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.66/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$265
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |