Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-8700K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-9350KF on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-8700K is 460 days older than the more expensive Core i3-9350KF.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9350KF - 389 vs 377 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$250.0 vs CA$806.27
- Up to 70% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9350KF - CA$0.64 vs CA$2.14 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700K - 91 vs 95 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
389
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for CA$806.27 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-8700K | vs | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |