Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 637 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 4% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen 5 1600 - 209 vs 201 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$250.0 vs CA$463.02
- Up to 44% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i3-9350KF - CA$1.24 vs CA$2.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.22/FPS
55%
Price, CA$
CA$463.02
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$463.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17824 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
201
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$250
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17825 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |