Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7700K is 1213 days older than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700K
- Performs up to 3% better in Starfield than Core i5-10400F - 61 vs 59 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Up to 56% cheaper than Core i7-7700K - CA$157.24 vs CA$359.88
- Up to 55% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7700K - CA$2.67 vs CA$5.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-7700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-7700K - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
61
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.9/FPS
45%
Price, CA$
CA$359.88
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$359.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13858 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
59
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$157.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$157.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13858 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-7700K | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |