Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1316 days newer than the cheaper FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 85% better in Diablo IV than FX-4300 - 172 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - CA$36.09 vs CA$214.29
- Up to 69% better value when playing Diablo IV than Core i7-6800K - CA$0.39 vs CA$1.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Diablo IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
172
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
31%
Price, CA$
CA$214.29
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$214.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
93
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6800K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
---|---|---|
May 31st, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell-E | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |