Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$239.49 vs CA$669.59
- Up to 58% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-13900F - CA$0.59 vs CA$1.39 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 19% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-6700T - 480 vs 404 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 32 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
404
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
480
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.39/FPS
42%
Price, CA$
CA$669.59
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$669.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |