Buy on Amazon
CA$239.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - CA$239.49 vs CA$834.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Stray than Core i9-10900X - CA$1.32 vs CA$4.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Stray than Core i7-6700T - 185 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
182
98%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.32/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$239.49
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$239.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
185
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.51/FPS
29%
Price, CA$
CA$834
28%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900X Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 4.7GHz Unlocked LGA2066 X299 Series 165W (BX8069510900X)
Buy for CA$834 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-10900X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
| Skylake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
