Buy on Amazon
CA$198.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 1703 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - CA$198.77 vs CA$464.26
- Up to 50% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-10900KF - CA$1.74 vs CA$3.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 17% better in Far Cry 6 than Core i7-6700T - 133 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 20 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
114
85%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.74/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$198.77
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-6700T 2.8GHz Tray CPU
Buy for CA$198.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.49/FPS
49%
Price, CA$
CA$464.26
42%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i9-10900KF (Base Stroke: 3.70GHz; Socket: LGA1200; 125 watt) Box
Buy for CA$464.26 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 182 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-6700T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i9-10900KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
