Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6700K is 30 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Performs up to 9% better in Rust than Core i5-6400 - 198 vs 182 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Up to 28% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - CA$158.51 vs CA$218.88
- Up to 22% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-6700K - CA$0.87 vs CA$1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
FPS
198
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.11/FPS
78%
Price, CA$
CA$218.88
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$218.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4628 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
182
91%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.87/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$158.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$158.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4628 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-6700K | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |