Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 4380 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-12700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 16% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-620M - 220 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | Intel Core i7-12700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |