Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-12700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-8350K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1552 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-8350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Core i3-8350K - 74 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 15% better value when playing Starfield than Core i3-8350K - CA$4.58 vs CA$5.4 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-8350K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i7-12700F - CA$318.88 vs CA$339.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-12700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
74
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.58/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$339
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$339 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13439 minutes ago
Buy for CA$318.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13439 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-12700F | vs | Intel Core i3-8350K |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |