Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3468 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Core i7-620M - 214 vs 211 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
214
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$136.71
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$136.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-620M | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |