Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms Core i7-620M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 4401 days newer than Core i7-620M.
Advantages of Core i7-620M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy than Intel Core i3-12100F - 35 vs 58 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 34% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i7-620M - 236 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-620M - 8 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-620M | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Arrandale | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1288 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD Graphics (Ironlake) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |