Buy on Amazon
CA$36.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 42 days newer than Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 4% better in War Thunder than Core i3-4160 - 166 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 54 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5820K doesn't have integrated graphics
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Intel Core I3-4160 3.60 2 LGA1150 BX80646I34160
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
91.72413793103448%
Multi-Core
2072
38.06724232959765%
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell E | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 140 W | TDP | 54 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
