Buy on Amazon
CA$36.09
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5820K outperforms FX-4300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5820K is 678 days newer than FX-4300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5820K
- Performs up to 85% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-4300 - 87 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4300 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4300
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-5820K - 95 vs 140 Watts
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
47
54%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.09
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4300 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.8 GHz 4M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$36.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-5820K
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FX-4300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5820K | vs | AMD FX-4300 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | FX |
| Haswell E | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
