Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5700HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5700HQ is 267 days newer than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5700HQ
- Performs up to 2% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 163 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 47 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5700HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2015
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-5700HQ | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Broadwell | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
47 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 5600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |