Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770HQ outperforms Xeon E5-2670 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-4770HQ is 69 days older than Xeon E5-2670 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4770HQ - 24 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770HQ
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 162 vs 160 FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 - 47 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Xeon E5-2670 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Core i7-4770HQ
Mobile • Jul 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3 | vs | Intel Core i7-4770HQ |
|---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2014 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1364 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 47 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 5200 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
