Key Differences
In short — Core i7-4770K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1620 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-4770K is 181 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4770K
- Performs up to 12% better in Valorant than Celeron G1620 - 760 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-4770K - CA$36.89 vs CA$158.88
- Up to 76% better value when playing Valorant than Core i7-4770K - CA$0.05 vs CA$0.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-4770K - 55 vs 84 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
760
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.21/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$158.88
23%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$158.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 59 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
680
89%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4770K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
84 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |