Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-4600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 2433 days newer than Core i7-4600M.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4600M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 37 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 26% better in F1 23 than Core i7-4600M - 240 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4600M - 20 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
240
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$368.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$368.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-4600M | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |