Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600KF outperforms Core i7-3940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 2796 days newer than Core i7-3940XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3940XM
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Performs up to 34% better in Starfield than Core i7-3940XM - 63 vs 47 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3940XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.91/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$246.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$246.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3940XM | vs | Intel Core i5-10600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |