Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - CA$214.0 vs CA$599.18
- Up to 41% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Core i9-13900F - CA$1.71 vs CA$2.92 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 64% better in Far Cry 3 than Core i7-3770K - 205 vs 125 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
125
60%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
205
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.92/FPS
58%
Price, CA$
CA$599.18
35%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$599.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |