Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - CA$214.0 vs CA$424.28
- Up to 37% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10900 - CA$0.45 vs CA$0.71 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-3770K - 596 vs 474 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
474
79%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$214
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$214 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
596
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
63%
Price, CA$
CA$424.28
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$424.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |