Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Core i7-3667U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2515 days newer than Core i7-3667U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3667U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 17 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 36% better in War Thunder than Core i7-3667U - 178 vs 131 FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$104.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$104.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3667U | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |